On the roof of the TV Asahi building at night, where it had been raining up until just moments before, Yoshiki and HYDE performed their first-ever TV collaboration. Red Swan is due for October 3 worldwide release, so before that happens, let’s see what unfolded on the night. Read more on this iconic fashion moment on CNN Style.The long full version of the new Attack on Titan theme song, Red Swan by Yoshiki and HYDE was premiered on TV Asahi’s Music Station Ultra Fes 2018 program on September 17. “Another example of necessity being the mother of invention,” she wrote. Lately, the trend has resurfaced thanks to Bella Hadid, Alexa Demie and Hailey Bieber, the last of whom Anderson recognized in a throwback post comparing side-by-side looks. But it was just one of the many visible thongs of the era - from Halle Berry to Rose McGowan - that made appearances on red-carpet events. When she turned around, her thong was fully visible, rising up from the ultra-low Eduardo Lucero jersey dress she was wearing.Īnderson revealed in 2016 during a panel discussion in Los Angeles that the style choice was a last-minute decision and was made out of necessity. Vespa/WireImage/Getty Images)ījörk’s infamous swan dress may be the first thing that comes to mind when you think about 2001 Oscars fashion, but there’s another ensemble that has become emblematic of the early 2000s: Gillian Anderson, at the height of “The X-Files” fame, stepping out for the Vanity Fair afterparty in a backless navy number with a cheeky surprise. Gillian Anderson attends the 2001 Vanity Fair Oscars afterparty. These films “speak to the times or offer some kind of social message,” he said. Some have a veneer of prestige based on creative teams or source material, while others have indie credibility or the mass approval of audiences – but Academy voters do tend to reward “important” films, said Dave Karger, a Turner Classic Movies host and Entertainment Weekly award correspondent. Oscars voters tend to reward "important" films: The films that wind up getting nominated for Oscars don’t have much in common these days. Polarizing films have a harder time winning best picture with this system.īlockbusters have changed: It’s not that Oscars voters are anti-blockbuster – it’s just that blockbusters today are less original fare than the likes of “E.T.” and “Titanic.” Instead, there are more sequels, reboots, prequels or other variations on familiar IP (intellectual property), experts told CNN, making the Academy less inclined to reward them. Ballots are whittled down and films are knocked out until one film ranked consistently high across a multitude of ballots remains. But Academy members use a preferential ballot when voting for the top prize, ranking the nominees in their preferred order. Here's why, according to experts in film and award shows:īest picture voting doesn’t reward risks: For every Oscar category except best picture, the nominee with the most votes wins. And if they are nominated, like “Avatar: The Way of Water,” awards prognosticators don’t expect them to win. But over the last two decades, the Oscars have largely avoided rewarding the blockbuster films that once dominated the awards.Įarning a nomination – and eventually winning – an Oscar is no easy feat, and many of the biggest box office smashes of the year don’t stand a chance at best picture. The Oscars have never been exactly predictable, but Hollywood’s biggest night used to consistently reward crowdpleasers. "Avatar: The Way of Water" was nominated for best picture at the Oscars this year, but most awards prognosticators don't expect it to win.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |